San FranciscoCalifornia(CA) Retana, Robert G. personal infomation and areas of practice

California San FranciscoPearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP attorney Retana, Robert G. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Complex Litigation Antitrust Litigation Securities Litigation Class Actions Antitrust & Trade Regulation Deceptive Trade Practices Unfair Competition 100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation ,Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Securities,Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP

if you have any problem in Trade Regulation Deceptive Trade Practices Unfair Competition 100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation ,Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Securities,please email to Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP or call 415-433-9000 or Go to our company directly(addr:44 Montgomery Street Suite 2450San Francisco,CA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Robert G. Retana is an accomplished litigator, with both civil and criminal experience and a long history of community involvement. ?After graduating from law school, Mr. Retana worked as a civil litigator at the Heller Ehrman firm in San Francisco, where he handled large, complex litigation as well as several pro bono matters. From 1994-1998, he served as an Assistant District Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco, where he was the Assistant Supervisor of the Misdemeanor Trial Division and a member of the Felony Domestic Violence Unit. ?As an Assistant District Attorney, Mr. Retana tried dozens of cases and handled hundreds of hearings.? He then worked as a litigator at Cotchett Pitre & Simon, where he handled complex cases, including class actions, securities and antitrust cases, on the plaintiff’s side. ?Mr. Retana next worked as an attorney for the Administrative Office of the Courts, in the Litigation Management Unit, where he handled litigation for and gave legal advice to judges, courts and court staff. ?Before joining Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, Mr. Retana was a named partner at Oliver, Sabec & Retana, where he handled litigation and intellectual property matters.? Mr. Retana has also served as a Judge Pro Tem in San Mateo County.

  At Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, Mr. Retana was a member of the trial team in In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation.? He worked extensively on the briefing of summary judgment motions and on the motions for preliminary and final approval of the settlements reached therein.? He was actively involved in the trial of that case, including the examination of witnesses.? As part of that trial team, Mr. Retana was nominated along with other lawyers from the firm by the Consumer Attorneys of California as a finalist for the Consumer Attorney of the Year Award.?

  Mr. Retana is currently counsel in two proposed class actions involving complex allegations of aiding and abetting Ponzi schemes.? One involves primarily Latinos in Los Angeles who invested in a company known as “Financial Plus” that targeted members of the Latino community.? A substantial settlement was reached in that matter with a national bank that is alleged to have aided and abetted the Ponzi scheme operator.? The other is brought on behalf of the trustee of an investment company whose assets were looted by its managers with the knowledge and assistance of its bank.?

  Mr. Retana has been featured as a speaker at events related to educating the public about investment scams.? For example, in March of 2013, he spoke about avoiding Ponzi schemes and financial fraud at Univision’s Feria Financiera, Plan Prosperidad 2013, held at the University of Southern California.? In the Fall of 2013, he was featured as a legal expert in a video produced by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) regarding investment fraud in the Latino community.

  Current Cases:

  ??????????? ??????????? In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.)

  ??????????? ??????????? Arreola v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.?(C.D. Cal.)

  ??????????? ??????????? Uecker v. Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC?(Bankr. N.D. Cal.)

• California, 1990 U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 1990 U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 1991 U.S. Supreme Court, 2001 U.S. District Court Central District of California U.S. District Court Eastern District of California U.S. District Court Southern District of California

• Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the SF Bay Area, 1990 - 2011 (Member) La Raza Lawyers Association, 2002 - 2005 (Board Member) La Raza Centro Legal (Former Board Member and former Board President) BALIF (Member) American Bar Association San Mateo County Bar Association Association of Business Trial Lawyers

• University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, Berkeley, California, 1990J.D. Columbia College, Columbia University, New York, New York, 1990B.A.Major: English

• Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP's lawyers have in excess of?100 years of legal experience. We have attained Martindale-Hubbell's highest rating (AV) in legal ethics and ability. Our lawyers bring individualized attention and a high level of expertise to your legal needs. We are problem solvers not problem makers. When litigation becomes necessary we are creative, aggressive, resourceful and successful.

Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP & Joy Attorneys

San Francisco lawyer Boardman, Thomas K. San Francisco California lawyer Newsom, William J. San Francisco California lawyer Retana, Robert G. San Francisco California lawyer Trevor, George S. San Francisco California lawyer Sheanin, Aaron M. San Francisco California lawyer Simon, Bruce L.

Complex Litigation Antitrust Litigation Securities Litigation Class Actions Antitrust & Trade Regulation Deceptive Trade Practices Unfair Competition 100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation ,Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Securities legal template form download

lawyer Retana, Robert G. Reviews

Litigation

Litigation

need free divorce forms to print out?

So this is a commercial tenant? Is your friend sure that it's the building, not the trade fixtures inside the building, that are being auctioned off? Trade fixtures are generally the tenants property, and creditors could attach them. There should be no way the owner of the building should run any risk of having their building taken. Your friend should get a real estate attorney to get to the bottom of it.

Parts of the agreement. . Your agreement consists of two parts:. . ? the Main Part, which may include a Schedule for either Assessment or Training. ? This describes the required length of service and repayment expected if the agreement is. not fulfilled. This part is signed by the physician and the Ministry prior to entering. training.. . ? the Addendum. ? This specifies your practice location. This part is signed by the physician, the community. and the Ministry upon completion of your training.. . Deadlines and requirements. . The Main Part of your return of service agreement must be signed and returned before you begin your training or assessment program. Doing so ensures that your position will be funded and that your start date will not be delayed. Some programs have specific deadlines for the return of documents, so be certain to review your acceptance letter and note any deadlines.

I have done child care and done actual applications and I dont know what more to do.... Also, restaurants and etc.

But now consider the situation if a copy of a Power of Attorney is valid. Now the person wants to end it. How do they do that? They get the original copy and tear it up. But if a copy is just as valid, then what? They get the copy and rip it up? How do they know there was only one copy? What if there were 100 copies all given to different people? Now the person has to hunt down all 100 copies and rip them up? And even if they do find all 100 copies and rip them up, how do they know there is not a 101th copy?

Online schooling prevents children from learning basic skills well. There are two situations where this happens. One: Young children--when children are started on computer school too young, they don't learn to read books and write on paper. They also miss out on human interaction. They don't learn to communicate verbally with real people. They also don't learn how to learn from real-life, hands-on activity.. Two: Older children abandon reading books and writing on paper. I saw this with my own young teen boys when they did math on the computer for one year. They did not work their problems on paper when they should have. It was much easier for them to just choose an answer from the computer screen. They also got more interested in playing games on the computer, which brought down their skills in other subjects too.. I think that with online schooling, children are expected to do too much learning on their own, without any additional explanation or assistance. Also, there is no one for them to be accountable to daily, so it is easy for them to get behind. Then, when the end of the school year rolls around, they are hopelessly behind, and don't get the credits for anything they have done. They have to repeat the grade. Possibly, too much work is expected from the student

this is the lawyers reviews