Notice:if have any questions about the law ,you can be found on our website related lawyer to answer you.Last month,the attorneys at lawyers-in-usa.com helped millions of people make smarter, more confident legal decisions.

AlexandriaVirginia(VA) Smith, David B. personal infomation and areas of practice

Virginia Alexandria Smith & Zimmerman, PLLC attorney Smith, David B.
  • Lawyer name:Smith, David B.
  • Address:108 N. Alfred Street Alexandria,VA
  • Phone:800-482-1860
  • Fax:703-548-8935
  • PostalCode:22314 -3053
  • WebSite:http://www.smithzimmerman.com/
  • Areas of Practice:Civil and Criminal Forfeiture White Collar Defense Victims' Rights ,Collections,

Virginia AlexandriaSmith & Zimmerman, PLLC attorney Smith, David B. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Civil and Criminal Forfeiture White Collar Defense Victims' Rights ,Collections, Criminal Defense,Smith & Zimmerman, PLLC

if you have any problem in Criminal Defense,please email to Smith & Zimmerman, PLLC or call 800-482-1860 or Go to our company directly(addr:108 N. Alfred Street Alexandria,VA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

  • For eight years prior to entering private practice, Mr. Smith was a prosecutor in the Criminal Division of the United States Department of Justice and at the United States Attorney's Office in Alexandria, Virginia. At Justice, he served in the Appellate and Narcotics Sections of the Criminal Division, and as the first Deputy Chief of the Asset Forfeiture Office where he was responsible for supervising all forfeiture litigation in the United States. At the United States Attorney's Office, he was involved in complex white collar criminal investigations, trials, and appeals involving defense procurement fraud, false claims, congressional bribery, mail fraud, tax evasion, theft of government property, espionage, false statements, and perjury. His government experience was broadly varied. In 1995-1996, while in private practice,?he served as a part-time Associate Independent Counsel in the investigation of Michael Espy, the former Secretary of Agriculture.

    In 1986, Mr. Smith began private practice. He recently formed a partnership with Jeffrey D. Zimmerman, a long-standing?colleague in the criminal defense bar. With Mr. Smith's extensive background in forfeiture law, he participates in civil and criminal forfeiture cases all over the country and consults extensively with other lawyers in this area of law. He is a frequent lecturer on forfeiture practice before national and state bar associations.

    Mr. Smith's practice includes federal criminal defense and criminal appeals. He has argued more than one hundred federal criminal appeals as a prosecutor and defense attorney, many of which were significant cases. He also has extensive experience with civil and criminal litigation in the Supreme Court of the United States.

    Mr. Smith is the author of the leading two-volume treatise, Prosecution and Defense of Forfeiture Cases (2012), published by Matthew Bender, and is considered the leading expert on forfeiture law in the United States. He is regularly quoted by newspaper reporters and has appeared on many national television and radio news programs. He is the co-author (with Terry Reed) of another leading treatise, Civil RICO (2012), also published by Matthew Bender. The book covers criminal prosecutions as well as private, civil litigation under the RICO statute. Mr. Smith has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in civil RICO cases and has prosecuted and defended a number of criminal RICO cases. Mr. Smith was named in the list of preeminent lawyers in the field of white collar criminal defense by the Virginia Super Lawyers (2009-2013), Best Lawyers of America (2012-2013), and Northern?Virginia?Magazine's Top Lawyers (2013).

    Mr. Smith has counseled the Senate and House Judiciary Committees on forfeiture reform legislation and congressional oversight of the government's forfeiture efforts. He was heavily involved in drafting the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000, the first major reform of our civil forfeiture laws in 200 years. Mr. Smith has also worked closely with the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules and the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules on amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure governing civil and criminal forfeiture proceedings. In 2000-2001, Mr. Smith was appointed by Senator Richard Shelby (R. Ala.), the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to serve as a Commissioner with the Judicial Review Commission on Foreign Asset Control. He received the NACDL President's Commendation for outstanding service in 1993, 1994 and 2004. Mr. Smith has represented the NACDL at meetings of the Over-Criminalization Working Group, which brings together various organizations across the political spectrum that share an interest in criminal justice reform. The Group is chaired by former Attorney General Edwin Meese, III of the Heritage Foundation.

    Mr. Smith has testified before congressional committees several times with respect to forfeiture, restitution?and money laundering legislation. On April 3, 2008, Mr. Smith testified before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security in opposition to S.973, the “Restitution for Victims of Crime Act.” The draconian pretrial asset restraint provision in the bill would have allowed the government to pauperize defendants and prevent them from retaining counsel without giving the defendant a fair opportunity to be heard on the propriety of the restraint. The bill was not approved by the Subcommittee. Mr. Smith testified on February 8, 2012 at a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security on "Combating Transnational Organized Crime: International Money Laundering as a Threat to our Financial Systems." The proposal, which he opposed, would have greatly expanded the government's powers to charge money laundering offenses and to seek forfeiture. The proposal went nowhere.

    Representative Cases

    United States v. $500,000 in U.S. Currency, 591 F.3d 402 (5th Cir. 2009) United States v. Nacchio, 573 F.3d 1062 (10th Cir. 2009) United States v. Kalish, 2009 WL 130215 (S.D. N.Y. 2009) In re Sealed Case, 527 F.3d 188 (D.C. Cir. 2008) United States v. Lawrence, 471 F.3d 135 (D.C. Cir. 2006) United States v. $4,224,958.57 in U.S. Currency, 392 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2004) United States v. $293,316 in U.S. Currency, 349 F.Supp.2d 638 (E.D. N.Y. 2004) ?

  • Virginia District of Columbia U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 1st Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia U.S. District Court Western District of Virginia U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia Virginia Supreme Court

  • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (Chair, Forfeiture Committee; member, Board of Directors; Vice-Chair, Amicus Curiae Committee) Board of Editors, The Champion

  • Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, 1976J.D. Pembroke College, Oxford, United KingdomGraduate Student, 1970-1972 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1970B.A.Honors: summa cum laude

Smith & Zimmerman, PLLC & Joy Attorneys

Alexandria Virginia lawyer Smith, David B. Alexandria Virginia lawyer Zimmerman, Jeffrey D.

lawyer Smith, David B. Reviews

What will the NDA involve in world of warcraft?

The results clearly show the shift in the public opinion the Europeans and Americans have about islam. Just two years ago the similar question caused the hysterical screams in answer, and very few dared to say they think the world would be better. Now the answer that the world would be better without islam has been chosen as the Best Answer.

I searched lots of website but I get very few images. I m in need of really good images suitable for powerpoint presentations. Thanks in advance!.

As is common, the banks don't really understand the Law.. Their concern is that - being in a nursing home - your mother in law is no longer mentally competent, so the General Power of Attorney is no longer valid. If that is the case, the bank are correct and you would be acting illegally using the General Power of Attorney.. If they are not correct, complain and ask for compensation: you will get passed on up the chain and eventually get someone who knows the law. They may demand proof of mental capacity.. Lasting Powers of Attorney should cost more than around ?200 (free if you can bear the massive amount of paper involved) plus ?120 to register if her income is more than ?16,500, currently free if income is less than ?12,000 (may be a charge of ?65 as from May.

Excellent observation sister Birdy. The hebrew word " was" in Genesis 1:2 should be " became". . God, in His excellence and beauty would not create an earth that does not match Him...This earth that was created in the Beginning was perfect in every way.. . "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, and the earth became waste and empty."

Changing your name??

this is the lawyers reviews
Lawyers bottom relation content