San FranciscoCalifornia(CA) Shefler, Taeva personal infomation and areas of practice

California San FranciscoPhillips & Cohen LLP attorney Shefler, Taeva is a Very good lawyer practice area in Government Agencies & Programs Government Contracts Health & Health Care Law Whistleblower -- Employee Whistleblower/Qui Tam ,Whistleblower/Qui Tam, Government Agencies & Programs, Government Contracts, Health & Health Care Law,Phillips & Cohen LLP

if you have any problem in Law Whistleblower -- Employee Whistleblower/Qui Tam ,Whistleblower/Qui Tam, Government Agencies & Programs, Government Contracts, Health & Health Care Law,please email to Phillips & Cohen LLP or call 415-836-9000 or Go to our company directly(addr:100 The Embarcadero Suite 300San Francisco,CA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Taeva Shefler joined Phillips & Cohen as a law fellow after graduating cum laude from New York University School of Law.

  Ms. Shefler was a student advocate with the Federal Defenders program in New York while in law school, representing indigent clients in federal misdemeanor court. She also was a legal intern with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Criminal Law Reform Project and the Legal Aid Society’s Prisoner Rights Project.

  Prior to pursuing a law career, Ms. Shefler worked as an employment counselor for homeless youth in Oakland, California.

  Ms. Shefler is bar qualified in California.

• California

• New York University School of Law, New York, New YorkHonors: cum laude

• Phillips & Cohen LLP is the nation’s most successful law firm representing whistleblowers in qui tam lawsuits. On behalf of whistleblowers, it brings Medicare fraud cases and qui tam cases involving other types of fraud under federal and state false claims laws.

  Phillips & Cohen recently was recognized as one of the nation’s top 20 “hot” plaintiffs’ litigation firms due to its success in representing whistleblowers. The National Law Journal said Phillips & Cohen has done “exemplary work during the past year.” It noted that “all the firms chosen have track records that go back years, sometimes decades.”

  Qui tam lawsuits brought by Phillips & Cohen on behalf of whistleblowers have returned more than $2 billion to the U.S. Treasury, making it by far the top whistleblower law firm in the country.

  Phillips & Cohen and several of its qui tam cases figure prominently in a highly praised book published recently by Atlantic Monthly Press. In Giantkiller: the Team and the Law that Help Whistleblowers Recover America's Stolen Billions, author Henry Scammell recounts the history of the False Claims Act and in-depth accounts of several whistleblower cases.

  Attorney John R. Phillips is “the nation’s premier whistleblower attorney,” according to the National Law Journal and The Wall Street Journal. The National Law Journal named him one of the “100 most influential lawyers” in the nation on its two most recent lists.

  The whistleblower law firm’s roster also includes former government fraud prosecutors, a former U.S. Senate Judiciary counsel, a former U.S. Attorney and experienced litigators recruited from the nation’s top law firms. They have expertise in a wide range of qui tam cases involving government contract fraud, including Medicare and Medicaid fraud and defense contractor fraud.

  Phillips & Cohen attorneys are nationally recognized experts on whistleblower (False Claims Act) cases and are frequently quoted in publications such as the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Several of their qui tam cases have been profiled on 60 Minutes.

  If you would like Phillips & Cohen to evaluate your qui tam case, please see our “Have a case” section.

Phillips & Cohen LLP & Joy Attorneys

San Francisco California lawyer Arens, Edward H. San Francisco California lawyer Hasegawa, Stephen S. San Francisco California lawyer Havian, Eric R. San Francisco California lawyer Jonas, Marie E. San Francisco California lawyer Lalas, Jonah J. San Francisco California lawyer Shefler, Taeva San Francisco California lawyer Zoglin, Larry

Government Agencies & Programs Government Contracts Health & Health Care Law Whistleblower -- Employee Whistleblower/Qui Tam ,Whistleblower/Qui Tam, Government Agencies & Programs, Government Contracts, Health & Health Care Law legal template form download

lawyer Shefler, Taeva Reviews

Health care

Salt Lake City Slicks.

The effect of Romney's plan. . Knowing all that, the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution that evaluates tax proposals submitted by presidential candidates, examined the effect of Romney?s tax rate cuts combined with the elimination of several common tax deductions. Those include the mortgage interest deduction, charitable giving deduction and the exclusion for health insurance. The center published its findings on Aug. 1, 2012.. . To try and keep with Romney's guiding principles, the authors eliminated deductions and write-offs -- starting with the deductions for top earners first -- until they came up with enough revenue to offset the $360 billion in tax cuts that are part of Romney's plan.. . They determined that people who earn $1 million or more in taxable income would see an average net tax decrease of $87,117. They?d save $175,961 from Romney's tax cut, but lose $88,444 in deductions.. . "They would still get a tax cut," said Adam Looney, one of the authors. "The dollar value of the tax cuts is just way bigger than the mortgage interest and other deductions. There?s no way to implement this plan in a way that doesn?t result in a pretty big tax cut for that group (those making more than $1 million).". . People who earn between $500,000 and $1 million would see a cut of about $17,000, and taxes for people with incomes between $200,000 and $500,000 would decrease by about $1,800, the study found.. . But to make Romney's plan revenue neutral, deductions would also have to be removed for people with incomes below $200,000, and the effects of that would be significant, the study found. In fact, the elimination of the deductions would mean outright tax increases for everyone with incomes below $200,000. People with taxable income between $50,000 and $75,000, for example, would see an average net tax increase of $641. They?d save $984 from Romney's rate cut, but lose $2,672 in write-offs.. . The authors specifically noted that taxpayers with children whose income is below $200,000 would see their taxes go up by an average of $2,041 -- the figure highlighted in Obama?s ad.. . The reason for the increase is that the most popular tax breaks heavily benefit middle- and lower-income families, the 95 percent of the population earning less than $200,000 who carry mortgage debt and use employer-provided health insurance.. . And though Romney has suggested he would focus on taking the deductions away from the wealthy, the study concluded that alone would not make up the difference of the revenue sacrificed when rates are slashed.. . "Somebody has to foot the bill for those tax cuts," Looney said. "You have to tap into middle- and lower-income households.". . : the study found that Romney couldn't keep all his goals based on what we know about his plan.. . Is it fair and Why?.

Change of Name in the UK?

just use Word or Powerpoint and email the digital copy and if you do not have those programs then download OpenOffice and do a Save As and pick an MS Office fomat for the file and email out the file.

My lawyer said that I did not have to be on all the custody paperwork for my stepson because my husband and I were married already prior to his birth and that I would have the same rights, but I have become doubtful looking intp Texas law. I haven't really found anything to answer my question. My husband works during the day and I take care of my daughter and stepson. He is on my insurance policy court ordered. His mother has supervised visits at my husbands discretion. She wants to go to all of his doctor's visits, and my husband told her that was not okay. She is only to be supervised by him or her parents. He tried to explain to her that she can request access to his medical records and can consult the physician if she wishes. Can anyone help answer my question?.

She has just one - the name of her current husband and if she didn't take his name when she married him then its whatever name she was legally using when she married him. As far as driver licenses go it is one per customer and it has to be in the state where you reside and park your car. You have to notify the state's department of motor vehicles of any change of address or name. If you don't do that you are in violation of the law and if it is discovered during a traffic stop you could be a guest of the county while the officer verifies who you are where you live. The officer will not let any driver drive off into the sunset if he can't verify who they are and where they are from. SSN is also one per customer but that is during their entire lifetime (unless they are in the witness protection program or have been a big time victum of identify theft).. Having more that one is a violation of federal law which means a big fine and a nice vacation as a guest of the federal government. Plus, the IRS is going to be notified and they will be looking at what numbers tax returns were filed under and how many refunds were issued to each of the SSNs. And the city, county, state and federal government is going to check and see if assistance was paid out under those numbers. And even the Department of Homeland Security is going to get involved and check to see if any of the socials or driver licenses are being used by someone else. You really don't like your step-mom do you.

this is the lawyers reviews