Notice:if have any questions about the law ,you can be found on our website related lawyer to answer you.Last month,the attorneys at lawyers-in-usa.com helped millions of people make smarter, more confident legal decisions.

MilwaukeeWisconsin(WI) Cincotta, Joseph R. personal infomation and areas of practice

Wisconsin Milwaukee Kerkman & Dunn attorney Cincotta, Joseph R.
  • Lawyer name:Cincotta, Joseph R.
  • Address:757 North Broadway Suite 300Milwaukee,WI
  • Phone:414-277-8200
  • Fax:414-277-0100
  • PostalCode:53202 -3645
  • WebSite:http://www.kerkmandunn.com/
  • Areas of Practice:Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Environmental Law Business Planning Antitrust & Trade

Wisconsin MilwaukeeKerkman & Dunn attorney Cincotta, Joseph R. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Environmental Law Business Planning Antitrust & Trade Regulation Bankruptcy Law Eminent Domain Mergers & Acquisitions Water Rights Unfair Competition Trade Secrets Fraudulent Transfers Business Litigation ,Antitrust, Bankruptcy, Eminent Domain, Environmental, Mergers & Acquisitions,Kerkman & Dunn

if you have any problem in Regulation Bankruptcy Law Eminent Domain Mergers & Acquisitions Water Rights Unfair Competition Trade Secrets Fraudulent Transfers Business Litigation ,Antitrust, Bankruptcy, Eminent Domain, Environmental, Mergers & Acquisitions,please email to Kerkman & Dunn or call 414-277-8200 or Go to our company directly(addr:757 North Broadway Suite 300Milwaukee,WI) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

  • Select Cases / Published Decisions

    PRN Associates LLC et al v State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, 2007AP476Represent business consortium LLC on challenge to the State’s abandonment and termination of pending state contract with that entity and a successor entity; multiple challenges filed and processed through administrative review and pending in circuit court. Cases involve applicability of regulatory guidelines for contracting with State and state agencies. Damages claim is substantial and raises statutory and common law issues related to sovereign immunity. Case argued at Wisconsin Supreme Court on March 5, 2009. Decision pending??Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, Published at 311 Wis.2d 1 (2008).Represented Town in action regarding constitutionality of Town’s conditional use permit ordinance and authority to establish conduct as public nuisance. Case was certified to the Wisconsin Supreme Court by Court of Appeals. Prevailed regarding nuisance claim. Court determined constitutionality of restrictive ordinance and established law on conditional use permits.??State of Wisconsin v. Defendant.Defense of private property owner in State DNR/Attorney General enforcement prosecution. Case involved construction work done at various properties throughout Wisconsin and applicability of federal wetlands laws and rules to Wisconsin counterparts in the areas of waterway creation and expansion and wetlands impacts. Succeeded in obtaining imposition of only very modest fine against strict liability provisions in Statutes and regulatory code.??McDonald v. Excel Engineering and Adashun Jones, Case No. 03-CV-552 (Fond Du Lac County). Prevailed after jury trial in defense of civil and architectural design and engineering firm regarding claim of excess stormwater runoff to neighboring property. Case involved analysis of methodology used to model stormwater flows for residential subdivision development and application of reasonable use doctrine. Jury verdict in our favor confirmed by circuit court in November 2008.??Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County et al.,Decision published at 282 Wis.2d 228 (2005). Represented three property owners and taxpayers of Town of Beaverbrook in Washburn County near Spooner, WI. County Highway Department sought a conditional use permit to construct and operate a non-metallic mine/gravel pit on the 40-acre property adjacent to client's homes. Case raised issues regarding the appropriate scope of review of Boards of Adjustment, whether a conditional use that will create a nuisance, and the adequacy of the mining reclamation plan prepared by the County under its own ordinances and Wisconsin DNR regulations NR 135. Plaintiffs prevailed in circuit court. County and BOA appealed and District III Court of Appeals in Wausau reversed. Wisconsin Supreme Court heard oral arguments February 1, 2005 and reversed in our favor on April 27, 2005.??Home Valu v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of Delaware, Inc.Published decision at 213F.2d 960 (7th Cir 2000). Opinion at Appeal No. 99-1168. Counsel on Appeal for Home Valu. Inc. in a common law tort action brought against Pep Boys. Pep Boys removed case under diversity provisions to federal court. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed against our position after oral argument on February 14, 2000 based on Seventh Circuit precedent barring fraudulent inducement claims under economic loss doctrine, and because the Wisconsin Supreme Court had yet to establish whether such claims remain viable under that doctrine. Opinion has been published at 213 F.3d 960 (7th Cir. 2000).

  • Supreme Court of the United States of America U.S. Court of Appeals 7th Circuit U.S. District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin

  • University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 1994J.D. University of Wisconsin, 1988B.S.Major: Civ. & Env. E.,

  • Kerkman & Dunn Featured News: Can A Business Be Saved?

    Corporate Report Wisconsin, recently featured an article by Attorney Jerome Kerkman. The article provides insight to business owners facing possible bankruptcy. Read more...

    Milwaukee and Madison, WI Bankruptcy Law Firm

    Finding a business law firm with knowledge, expertise and a track record of success is important for a business of any size. Kerkman & Dunn is that law firm. We have provided quality representation and excellent personal customer service for several years and in several states, concentrating in chapter 11, business bankruptcy, business reorganization, complex business litigation, environmental and transaction matters.

    Significant Cases

    Citicorp North America, Inc.

    (Wisconsin) Represented Citicorp North America, a subsidiary of Citigroup, specializing in lending to national franchisees, in collecting debt from Kentucky Fried Chicken franchisee in Wisconsin which filed chapter 11. Result: in cooperation with Chapter 11 trustee, sold restaurants to another franchisee, resulting in a full recovery of principal and accrued interest.

Kerkman & Dunn & Joy Attorneys

Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Cincotta, Joseph R. Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Espin, David J. Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Kerkman, Jerome R. Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Mayer, Kathryn L. Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Schmit, Evan P. Milwaukee Wisconsin lawyer Schrieber, Gregory M.

lawyer Cincotta, Joseph R. Reviews

Litigation

Litigation

i'm turning sixteen soon and i want to get a job, hopefully in a high street shop if not then a cafe or supermarket. trying to work on my cv but i'm not sure what to include- i have my contact info, school info (eg exams i've done, what i'm doing now) my 'skills' (like choir, drama, etc), work experience i have in a charity shop but i dunno if i should include the work experience i did shadowing a doctor (cos i'm interested in medicine but don't think shops will care). also what am i to write in the 'objective' bit? am i to talk about my good qualities, say what my long-term career goals are or what i'm looking for in this part-time job. i know there are lots of template cvs on the internet but they all seem to be for adults, and i'm only 15!.

A will distributes estate assets only after death. A trust designates distribution of assets prior to death, and puts the assets into Trust to be managed by a Trustee until the death of the Grantor/Settlor. The grantor no longer owns the trust property, the Trust does, but he/she can designate use of the assets until he/she dies. A trust protects the property from someone trying to sue or garnish the Grantor's property because he/she does not own it in title - the Trust owns it

. When applicable, the requirements for consulting or social services contracts, as provided for under Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 39:1503, have been complied with. . The (Department of _______) has developed and fully intends to implement a written plan providing for: . a. The assignment of (provide names) to a monitoring and liaison function

a store, website, or unique template idea for 60th b-day?.

. list-style: none

Everyone seems to be doing this now so i thought i would look into it, has anyone done it and been successful. How do you go about it can you just ask your bank and leave it to them to make an offer or do you have to a lot of work, i am not very confident dealing with people and would probably back down if it became a battle so just how easy is it.

this is the lawyers reviews
Lawyers bottom relation content