VinelandNew Jersey(NJ) Scrocca, Renee E. personal infomation and areas of practice

New Jersey VinelandTesta Heck Scrocca & Testa, P.A. attorney Scrocca, Renee E. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Insurance Defense Insurance Coverage 90% of Practice Devoted to Litigation ,Bad Faith Insurance, Insurance, Insurance Defense, Litigation & Appeals, Personal Injury -- Defense,Testa Heck Scrocca & Testa, P.A.

if you have any problem in ,Bad Faith Insurance, Insurance, Insurance Defense, Litigation & Appeals, Personal Injury -- Defense,please email to Testa Heck Scrocca & Testa, P.A. or call 856-899-5327 or Go to our company directly(addr:424 Landis Avenue Vineland,NJ) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Renee E. Scrocca is a graduate of the Delaware School of Law and was admitted to the New Jersey Bar in 1985. She has represented and counseled clients in Municipal Court, Superior Court, and Federal District Court.

  As part of the practice, Ms. Scrocca defends personal injury and property damage claims. She also specializes in insurance issues, monitors and analyzes all defense files, and handles depositions, arbitrations, conferences, and other court appearances for the firm. Ms. Scrocca also appears for the firm in workers' compensation and plaintiff's personal injury matters. Ms. Scrocca's professional associations include the New Jersey State Bar Association, the Cumberland County Bar Association, and the Cape May County Bar Association.

• New Jersey, 1985 U.S. District Court District of New Jersey, 1985

• New Jersey State Bar Association (Member) Cumberland County Bar Association (Member) Cape May County Bar Association, 1996 - 1997 (President)

• Widener University School of Law, Wilmington, Delaware, 1985J.D.Honors: cum laude Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, 1981B.A.

• When you choose Testa Heck Scrocca & Testa, PA to handle your legal needs, you have their promise that they will vigorously defend your rights, provide sound legal advice, and allow your voice to be heard. This philosophy has resulted in the settlement or successful litigation of thousands of cases. Although they represent each client with the same commitment, the following are some of their most challenging cases.

  Former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman was looking for experienced trial attorneys to represent the State in its historic lawsuit against the tobacco industry. Michael Testa and the firm were retained as co-counselors in the case, along with six other firms. A suit was filed against the tobacco industry seeking to recover billions of dollars that the State and its taxpayers paid through the Medicaid program for health care costs attributable to smoking related illnesses. Prior to going to trial, a 7.5 billion dollar settlement was reached for the State of New Jersey.

  In Vineland, an eight year old child was struck by a car while crossing the street to board her school bus. The child sustained severe injuries as the result of the accident. Michael Testa obtained a settlement with a total value of $1,855,832 plus attorney fees.

  An electro-mechanic at Foster Forbes Glass Company was severely injured in an accident at work. As a result of this accident, he lost his life. At trial, an award for the family in the amount of $1,052,000 was obtained.

  In Atlantic City, a construction worker was injured when the second floor slab of a garage structure at a casino and the scaffold on which he was standing collapsed. He fell 18 feet to the first floor under concrete debris sustaining serious injuries. Michael Testa obtained an award for the injured worker totaling $1,665,000.

  A 17 year old female was injured on a jet ski collision that resulted in a below the knee amputation. The matter was vigorously defended with the defendants claiming the plaintiff was responsible for the collision. The case settled for $1.2 million.

  Michael L. Testa represented a construction worker who was killed and another who was injured when the Tropicana Garage collapsed during construction. That case settled collectively for all of the plaintiffs for a total of $101 million dollars, the largest injury construction settlement in the United States.

  In Atlantic County a 54 year old woman was injured in an automobile accident. After an extended period, as a result of the accident, she lost her life. Michael Testa obtained a settlement in the amount of $800,000.00.

Testa Heck Scrocca & Testa, P.A. & Joy Attorneys

Vineland New Jersey lawyer Casella, Robert J. Vineland New Jersey lawyer Ferrucci, Sharon A Vineland New Jersey lawyer Heck, Todd W. Vineland New Jersey lawyer Testa, Michael L. Jr. Vineland New Jersey lawyer Testa, Michael L. Sr. Vineland New Jersey lawyer Scrocca, Renee E. Vineland New Jersey lawyer White, Justin R.

Insurance Defense Insurance Coverage 90% of Practice Devoted to Litigation ,Bad Faith Insurance, Insurance, Insurance Defense, Litigation & Appeals, Personal Injury -- Defense legal template form download

lawyer Scrocca, Renee E. Reviews

Litigation

Litigation

What should you include in a letter of retirement?

. }

Why were you given a conditional green card? Did you enter as a K1? If so you should have been issued a green card after marriage.. . You should use your married name now. Contact your nearest embassy or consulate to change your passport. Contact CIS to change your green card.

I'm in Canada. buh might works in Dubai. how to become each of these?. their avg pays?. and what is the highest I can learn as a lawyer?. thnky:).

how to change name?

That's an acceptable definition of judicial review.. . Another way to think about it is this: every case that comes before the Court is a dispute between two parties. Roe v. Wade means that there was a dispute between someone named Roe and someone named Wade. Roe was the name (a pseudonym, we know) of a woman who was arguing (at the time) that the state law banning abortion was unconstitutional. Wade was the name of the District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas who was arguing that the state law was constitutionally permissible. Roe's job was to attack the state law and Wade's job was to defend the state law. The federal courts ended up resolving the dispute in favor of Roe, agreeing with her argument that the state law violates the Constitution.. Brown v. Topeka Board of Education was a dispute between certain members of the Brown family, who lived in Topeka, KS, and the city's Board of Education. The Browns argued that the law/policy of sending all black children to public schools that only allowed blacks to enroll and sending all white children to public schools that only allowed whites to enroll was unconstitutional. The Board of Education disagreed and argued that the constitution allows the segregation of white and black students. The US Supreme Court agreed with the Browns that the Constitution does not allow it.. But then there's cases like Smith v. Employment Division of Oregon. Here, certain people (one named Smith) argued that it is unconstitutional for the state to ban the use/consumption of the drug Peyote because that ban violates the Constitution. The Employment Division of Oregon argued that the law is constitutionally permissible, and the latter won this case. The Supreme Court disagreed with Smith.. . The cases that involve a constitutional dispute are always known as cases of judicial review, because the Court is being asked which one of the two parties are legally correct about what the Constitution means. Every time the courts do nullify the law or policy at hand, those are not the only instances of judicial review. Even when the courts uphold the law being challenged or attacked, the courts are still exercising judicial review. In all such disputes, one party will win and the other party will lose, but so long as the case involves the question of whether the Constitution has been violated, the case is still calls upon the courts to exercise the power of interpreting the US Constitution.

this is the lawyers reviews