RochesterNew York(NY) Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq. - Rochester, NY personal infomation and areas of practice

New York RochesterMeredith M. B. Lamb Esq. attorney Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq. - Rochester, NY is a Very good lawyer practice area in Estate Planning Probate & Estate Administration Medicaid Planning Legacy Planning Elder Law Business Succession Planning Trusts Wills ,Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq.

if you have any problem in Elder Law Business Succession Planning Trusts Wills ,please email to Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq. or call 585-310-1578 or Go to our company directly(addr:290 Linden Oaks Suite 200Rochester,NY) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Your Family's Law Firm

  At Weinstein & Randisi, we are committed to helping clients build comprehensive, customized plans for the future – no matter what stage of life they are in. Our Rochester, New York, estate planning law firm is set apart by our attentive client service and our personalized approach, which gives clients exactly what they need to protect their assets and their legacy.

  It's impossible to know what tomorrow will bring. Our attorneys can't predict the future, but they can help you plan for the unexpected. We work closely with clients, learning about their assets and their goals. Then we craft individual estate plans that fit their needs.

  Your life isn't the same as everyone else's, so your estate plan shouldn't be either. One-size-fits-all plans allow critical details to fall through the cracks, and often don't give you the options to accomplish your goals. Our lawyers guide clients through the process of not only planning for distribution of their property, but also for end-of-life decisions, Medicaid qualification and nursing home care.

  At Weinstein & Randisi, we also guide families through the process of estate, probate and trust administration after they have lost a loved one. Our goal is to make difficult times more manageable, so that our clients can grieve and concentrate on being with their families.

  Contact Your Rochester Estate Planning Law Firm

  To schedule a free consultation with an experienced Rochester estate planning attorney, contact Weinstein & Randisi at 585-310-1578 or toll free at 800-768-1780.

Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq. & Joy Attorneys

Rochester lawyer Elizabeth K. Randisi Esq. - Rochester, NY Rochester lawyer Elizabeth K. Randisi Esq. - Rochester, NY Rochester lawyer Michael D. Schmitt - Rochester, NY Rochester lawyer Elizabeth K. Randisi Esq. - Rochester, NY

Estate Planning Probate & Estate Administration Medicaid Planning Legacy Planning Elder Law Business Succession Planning Trusts Wills legal template form download

lawyer Meredith M. B. Lamb Esq. - Rochester, NY Reviews

estate planning

My mom passed away in November. Her house, which has no mortgage is in her and my dad's name ( he passed away in 2005 ). What steps do I have to go through ( I am the executor) to get the house in my name so I can sell it? I live in Indiana..

Circumstances of the Case:. . Nine young African-American men hopped a ride aboard an empty freight train heading through Alabama. A group of young white men had also hopped aboard for transport through the State. A fight ensued between the groups, and all but one of the young white men were thrown from the train. Enraged, they sent a message ahead to the town of Scottsboro to report the incident. When the local sheriff and a posse of citizens stopped the train before it reached Scottsboro, two young white women testified that they had been sexually assaulted by the young African-American men on board the train.. . All nine were taken into custody, and when word of the allegations spread angry crowds gathered around the jailhouse. Unable to restrain the demonstrators or guarantee the safety of the accused, the sheriff called for the Alabama National Guard.. . Throughout the proceedings, none of the ?Scottsboro? boys was allowed to contact their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their ?clients.? All nine youths were found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.. . Constitutional Issues:. . The question before the Court regarded the right to legal counsel guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and how that right was applied to the States by the 14th Amendment. Must States provide counsel to citizens who cannot afford an attorney? Could a citizen be sentenced to death without benefit of counsel? Was the right to counsel so fundamental that the trial could not be fair without an attorney being provided? Was the right to counsel guaranteed in State trials by the 14th Amendment?. . Arguments:. . For Powell: The Scottsboro trials were a travesty of justice?the accused having been railroaded through a discriminatory system. The young black men's right to counsel was so fundamental to criminal proceedings that any trial conducted without a defense attorney was not a fair trial at all. Alabama's conduct of the trial was unfair?a violation of a basic rule of decency and justice under the Constitution. Justice demanded that the death sentences be overturned and that new trials be ordered.. . For Alabama: The right to legal counsel as stated in the 6th Amendment applies only to federal courts. Each State conducts its own criminal justice system, separate from federal authority, under the reserved powers of the Constitution. Alabama has its own bill of rights that recognizes the right of the accused to obtain counsel, but does not require the State to pay for attorneys to defend accused persons. The Supreme Court should not interfere with the internal operation of the State courts and it had never done so in 140 years. Moreover, an attorney defended the accused, but they were all convicted.. . Decision and Rationale:. . Justice Sutherland wrote the 7-2 majority opinion, overturning the convictions of the young black men and requiring that a new trial be held with the benefit of legal counsel appointed by the court. Sutherland wrote ?No attempt was made to investigate?. Defendants were immediately hurried to trial.?? The Court noted that ?a defendant, charged with a serious crime, must not be stripped of his right to have sufficient time to advise with counsel and prepare his defense.? To deny that, Sutherland wrote, ?is not to proceed promptly in the calm spirit of regulated justice but to go forward with the haste of the mob.?. . The Court found that the right to counsel was one of the ?'fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions'? We think the failure of the trial court to give [the young black men] reasonable time and opportunity to secure counsel was a clear denial of due process? '[T]here are certain immutable principles of justice which inhere in the very idea of free government which no member of the Union [no State] may disregard.'?. . With this ruling, the Court set a precedent?under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, counsel must be guaranteed to everyone facing a possible death sentence, whether in State or federal court. The Scottsboro case was the beginning of an ?incorporation? into State constitutions of fair trial rights guaranteed by the 6th Amendment. These rights were made applicable to the States by the 14th Amendment.

This contract is connected with real estate brokerage. I need a very simple definition for a non-lawyer.

My Girlfriend is in Texas right now going through college and working. She has some debts and problems that she needs to solve here in Florida. I am going to represent her and act as a middle man but I guess I need a notarised paper from her saying that I am allowed to do that. I want to write the letter, sign it and mail it to her so that she can get it notirised and signed and send it back to me.

I just got a job offer that would require me to show up on monday.?

Appreciate any advice. Thanks in advance..

this is the lawyers reviews