BostonMassachusetts(MA) Herlihy, Jennifer Boyd personal infomation and areas of practice

Massachusetts BostonAdler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian, L.L.P. attorney Herlihy, Jennifer Boyd is a Very good lawyer practice area in Civil Litigation Matters Medical Malpractice Product Liability Toxic Torts Personal Injury ,Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Toxic Torts,Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian, L.L.P.

if you have any problem in Injury ,Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Toxic Torts,please email to Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian, L.L.P. or call 617-830-2720 or Go to our company directly(addr:75 Federal Street 10th FloorBoston,MA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Ms. Herlihy is an experienced trial attorney handling a variety of civil litigation matters, including medical malpractice, product liability, toxic torts and personal injury. Ms. Herlihy defends medical providers in medical malpractice, personal injury, and product liability cases. She represents physicians, physician assistants, certified registered nurse anesthetists, hospitals, medical facilities, chiropractors, optometrists, nurses, dentists, physical therapists, massage therapists, pharmacists, attorneys and other professionals in both state and federal courts and before licensing and administrative boards.

  Ms. Herlihy also represents property owners and product designers, manufacturers and distributors in the defense of product liability, toxic tort and other negligence claims, including but not limited to asbestos, formaldehyde, benzene and mold.

  Ms. Herlihy was selected, based on a vote of all licensed attorneys in the state and a review by an independent blue ribbon panel, as a "Rising Star" Super Lawyer from 2005-2010 and as a Super Lawyer in 2011, 2012 and 2013.

  Representative Trials/Significant Decisions:

  ? Attorney Jennifer Herlihy and Attorney Michael Barkley obtained dismissal of all claims asserted against their client, a psychiatrist. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in the medications he prescribed and the manner in which he treated the decedent for depression and anxiety, allegedly resulting in the decedent's sudden death from aspiration vomitus following ingestion of alcohol and methadone. On behalf of the defendant, Attorneys Herlihy and Barkley filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that the defendant's duty of care did not extend to taking the measures that allegedly would have prevented this patient's death, and further that the plaintiff could not sustain her burden of proof in establishing a causal connection between any negligent act or omission by the defendant and the decedent's death. The Court allowed the defendant's Motion, dismissing all claims against the defendant psychiatrist.??Jennifer Herlihy received the Court's decision in their client's favor in a permanent injunction suit in Rhode Island involving their client's use of an outdoor wood fired boiler ("OWB") in a rural area to heat their home. The case was tried before Judge Rodgers over various days by Attorneys Herlihy and Mastan from July-September 2009. The plaintiffs contended the use of the OWB constituted negligence, trespass and nuisance. The defense provided evidence that the operation of the OWB was appropriate, especially for the location, and did not constitute any tort or cause harm and used expert testimony in support. The Court held that the plaintiffs did not sustain their burden on any of the Counts tried and cited the expert testimony, the lay witness testimony and testimony of the defendants in reaching her decision. The complete 30 page decision can be found at http://www.courts.ri.gov/Courts/SuperiorCourt/DecisionsOrders/09-908.pdf.??Jennifer Herlihy obtained a defense verdict in a Middlesex Superior Court jury trial on behalf of a psychiatrist after 3 weeks of testimony. The plaintiff Estate alleged that the psychiatrist, as well as other defendants, incorrectly prescribed medications, including methadone, that caused the death of their son. The jury returned a verdict of no negligence on behalf of the psychiatrist.

  INVITED PRESENTATIONS

  ??"Through A Glass Clearly"- Clinical Risk Management Seminar- October 1 and 22, 2005

  ??"It's Not just a Paper Chase: Making the Case for Documentation" – Legal Member of the Mock Trial Team and Panel Discussion, March 29, 2006

  ??"Depositions- Expectations vs. Realities"- Legal Member for MMS presentation, January 16, 2007

  ??"Judgment Day: Surviving a Trial"- Legal Member for MMS presentation, January 31, 2007

  ??"Asbestos: Re-Ignited"- Legal Member for Presentation- February 20, 2007?

  ??"Preventing and Controlling Infectious Agents in Healthcare Facilities" – Presentation- May 21, 2007

  ??"What To Do When You’ve Been Served"- Grand Rounds- June 26, 2007

  ??LexisNexis Professional Development Teleconference Series: "Time Management"- January 24, 2008

  ??"Mock Deposition"- Legal Member, April 24, 2008

  ??"Depositions- The Key to Your Defense"- MAPU, April 30, 2008

  ??"The Massachusetts Board of Registration of Chiropractors",? Massachusetts Chiropractic Society, "- September 25, 2009

  ??"Direct Exams/Cross Exams," MCLE, 13th Annual Personal Injury Law Conference 2010- April 30, 2010

  ??"Direct and Cross Examination Skills Workshop", MCLE, June 29, 2012

  ??Brigham & Women Hospital's OB/GYN Grand Rounds on 4/3/13- Legal Presenter

  ?

• Massachusetts Rhode Island U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts U.S. District Court District of Rhode Island

• Massachusetts Bar Associations (Member) Rhode Island Bar Associations (Member) Rhode Island Women's Bar Association (Member) Trial Attorneys of America, Member

• Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts, 1997J.D.Honors: cum laudeHonors: NITAHonors: ATLA and Mock Trial Competitions Boston University, College of Communications, 1993B.S.Honors: cum laude

• Proven experience. Trusted guidance.

  Whether in a courtroom arguing a complex case or in a conference room negotiating a creative settlement, there is no substitute for experience. At Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian LLP, we have a degree of experience and specialized expertise that surpasses that of many larger firms.

  Our experience, both in and out of the courtroom, provides us with the perspective needed to help our clients assess all their options and achieve their legal objectives.

  Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian is a well-established, full service firm with longstanding client relationships in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. When asked why they choose to work with us, our clients often point to the following attributes:

  Reputation

  We are well recognized for excellence. All of our named partners have been honored as Boston Magazine Super Lawyers six years in a row, 2004-2009. They have also earned the coveted Martindale-Hubbell AV rating for ability and ethics, the highest rating possible. Partners of our firm have been named to other prestigious lists, including the Best Lawyers in America and Boston Magazine's Rising Stars, Top 100 Lawyers and Top 50 Female Lawyers. Our firm was chosen by the prestigious Massachusetts Medical Society to serve as sole counsel for its Legal Advisory Plan.

  Trial experience

  Few law firms in the region can match our trial experience. We have tried many cases, including high-profile liability and malpractice cases, to successful jury decisions. We know how to try even the most complex cases; and we know how and when to pursue alternative resolutions.

  Client focus

  From initial consultation to final resolution, we focus on finding the right solution for each client. We clearly establish their goals and priorities, developing strategies with their best interest in mind.

  Collaborative approach

  We work as a team, leveraging our individual areas of expertise to deliver the greatest value to our clients. The attorneys with the most relevant experience are devoted to each case.

  Cost-effectiveness

  Our focus is on delivering real value. That means developing strategies for resolving cases cost-effectively, in accordance with our clients' priorities. It also means using our resources appropriately to provide the highest quality service at the most reasonable cost.

  Chemistry

  Some of our named partners have worked together for more than two decades and many of our staff have been with us 15 years or more. We work well together and with our clients, who enjoy highly personal service from very personable professionals.

  We look forward to showing you how Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian has earned the trust of clients in a variety of industries and circumstances.

Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman and Guekguezian, L.L.P. & Joy Attorneys

Boston lawyer Barkley, Michael B. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Bell, Gabriel W. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Glahn, Brooks L. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Harvey, Alexandra B. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Herlihy, Jennifer Boyd Boston Massachusetts lawyer LaBrecque, E. Amy Boston Massachusetts lawyer Lenkiewicz, Thaddeus M. Boston Massachusetts lawyer McClafferty, Michelle L. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Terry, Alexander E. Boston Massachusetts lawyer Wakeman, George E. Jr.

Civil Litigation Matters Medical Malpractice Product Liability Toxic Torts Personal Injury ,Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Toxic Torts legal template form download

lawyer Herlihy, Jennifer Boyd Reviews

Litigation

Litigation

My teacher said if forming a contact. However, I just found 6 element, which are:. 1/ Offer. 2/ Acceptance. 3/ Consideration. 4/ Intention to create legal relationship. 5/ Genuine Consent. 6/ Legality of object. . I don't know the 7th of the elements. Pls kindly advise and explain the elements. Thanks!.

Since most politicians are lawyers why do you trust them? Would you rather trust a businessperson?. Corrine....I'm reporting you . hope you get some help . bye..

1. Abortion,who is to be blamed? 2. the power of men over women 3. the power of women over men 4. Premarital sex.. are you in or out?.. 5. Legaliting divorce in the Philippines, yes or no?.. thx plssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

practically every State looks at changes this way. He was born with his Father's last name. In your rush to get all of your facts out, you left out a fact that would help. How old is your son now? A child forms connections through their name. To change the name would be disruptive to the child's development. This is the bottom line. A child's "best interests is what most concerns the Court. I realize that you feel that you know what's best for your child, but most of the time, the judges get it right.. . My own opinion is that if you could get the Father's parental rights terminated, getting your son's surname changed wold be easier. Based upon what you say, that there has been practically no visitation

. what if he passes away.

what would a world without lawyers be like (serious).

this is the lawyers reviews