SeattleWashington(WA) Betz, Colonel F. personal infomation and areas of practice

Washington SeattlePerkins Coie LLP attorney Betz, Colonel F. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Personal Planning Nonprofit Organizations Family Office Services Winery & Vineyard ,Estate Planning, Personal Injury, Personal Injury -- Defense,Perkins Coie LLP

if you have any problem in ,Estate Planning, Personal Injury, Personal Injury -- Defense,please email to Perkins Coie LLP or call (206) 359-6346 or Go to our company directly(addr:1201 Third Avenue Suite 4900Seattle,WA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Colonel Betz focuses his practice on personal, tax and estate planning for individuals and families as well as the representation of fiduciaries in estate and trust administration. He advises clients on a broad range of basic and sophisticated estate planning strategies, estate and trust administration issues, probate, estate and trust dispute resolution matters, and the preparation of gift and estate tax returns. His practice includes planning for executives, business owners and multigenerational families, as well as philanthropic planning. He also assists individuals with the preparation of prenuptial agreements.

• Washington U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

• University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Washington, 1999J.D. University of Washington, 1995B.A.Honors: magna cum laudeMajor: Business AdministrationMajor: Accounting

Perkins Coie LLP & Joy Attorneys

Seattle lawyer Betz, Colonel F.

Personal Planning Nonprofit Organizations Family Office Services Winery & Vineyard ,Estate Planning, Personal Injury, Personal Injury -- Defense legal template form download

lawyer Betz, Colonel F. Reviews

estate planning

name change on recently imigrated minor childrec?

How do you write a business memo?

Yes, yes, yes! Come on Pony's! I've been waiting for something like this.

and I am assuming your employer was not a party to this contract.. . Given that you signed the contract with the agency, creates a small issue, but it can be resolved as follows:. . (1) Assuming the agency signs documents and conducts business on behalf of the employers, it may be shown that the agency is the legal 'agent' for the employer. Hence actions of the agent in the normal course of business will be the actions of the employer. Thus, to simplify, your employer will be bound by the contract you signed with the agency, and is bound to keep you employed for 11 weeks.. . (2). The Agency dealt with you. It made a representation to you (in writing) that the employment was for 11 weeks. You believed this. Had you known it was only for four weeks you would not have agreed to this contract. Based on the 11 week representation, you therefore entered into the contract, which now has worked to your detriment. This is a legal misrepresentation, against the agency, and you can sue the agency directly for misrepresentation and recover the difference in the pay you would have received, as well as other legally allowable expenses.. . (3) Also the Agency dealt with you and in its contract stated the period of employment to be 11 weeks. There are now attempting to back out from the contract and this term, and this is a breach of their contract with you. Assuming that there is no limiting clauses in the contract, you would be able to recover for money/compensation reasonably contemplated at the time of signing the contract, which includes the amount of money (difference) for the 11 weeks of work.. . Winning a legal case, requires proof and evidence. I have very little facts here, but generally I would assume that the agency would deny being an actual 'agent' of the employer and would make the first option be a little difficult to prove. You would need to look at the conduct of the agency and other factors to determine how connected they are to the employer, so as to establish a legal 'agency'.. . On the other hand, the second option may be more viable as it places the agency in the direct line of legal fire. Practically, you would get your equivalent money's worth. You already have the contract in writing with the 11 week representation. Most of your proof is thus essentially there

I owe a little over 2 thousand dollars to a credit card company. It was less, but as credit card companies are, they tacked on interest.. I was served a summons to appear in court in September and i received a letter in the mail from the attorney's who are representing the credit card company. I've tried talking to the credit card company in the past stating my situation and they still ask the same questions, i can't get anywhere with them or with these attorney's.. I am currently unemployed, i have no income coming in, i don't own property or have stocks. I have had to go back and live with my mother because otherwise i would be homeless right now.. . What kind of questions can i ask a debt attorney?. . What else can the credit card company do in order to get this money from me?. . I can't even file bankruptcy because i don't have 15,000. If i had that i would have paid off my dept with the credit card company.

Best for web site templates?

this is the lawyers reviews