Los AngelesCalifornia(CA) Wax, Gary J. personal infomation and areas of practice

California Los AngelesGreines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP attorney Wax, Gary J. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Federal Appellate Practice, State Appellate Practice,Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP

if you have any problem in Federal Appellate Practice, State Appellate Practice,please email to Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP or call (310) 859-7811 or Go to our company directly(addr:5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor Los Angeles,CA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• Gary Wax always appreciates a tough challenge. After a decade-long career in the film industry, Gary reinvented himself as an appellate attorney, becoming an associate at GMSR in 2010.

  Before law school, Gary worked as an executive for entertainment companies like Miramax Films, acquiring the theatrical distribution rights for several feature films?most memorably, the Brazilian Oscar-nominated film, City of God.

  During law school, Gary was elected Chief Note & Comment Editor of the Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, for which he penned two articles. One of them took on anti-trust issues in the cable television industry; the other raised First Amendment concerns about proposed anti-paparazzi laws in the Los Angeles area. He also took home the “Best Brief” award at Loyola’s Scott Moot Court competition in 2009.

  During law school, Gary externed for the Honorable R. Gary Klausner at the Central District of California and clerked at GMSR. He also donated his time as a tutor for the Loyola Writing Tutors Program, and as a mentor to first-year students in the school’s Academic Support Mentoring Program.

  In his spare time, Gary enjoys traveling, listening to live music, and watching dark, thought-provoking films. His top five favorite legal films of all time: 12 Angry Men, A Few Good Men, The Verdict, Reversal of Fortune, and Primal Fear. Honorable Mention: From the Hip.

• Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, California, 2009J.D.Law Review: Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, Chief Note and Comment Editor New York University, 1994B.F.A.Major: Film/TV

• In the appellate courtsWe have handled cases in the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit, every appellate court in California, and the Supreme Courts of Alaska and Nevada. We have been counsel of record in over 400 published decisions and in many more hundreds of unpublished decisions, and we have represented amici curiae in many additional matters.In addition to appeals, we have prepared and responded to countless petitions for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, petitions for review to the California Supreme Court, and petitions for extraordinary writ relief to intermediate appellate courts. We also frequently submit amicus curiae letters to the California Supreme Court urging it to take some action, such as granting review in cases presenting issues of statewide importance or "depublishing" intermediate appellate decisions that muddle the law.In the trial courtsAlthough our practice is concentrated in the appellate courts, we serve our clients in the trial arena as well. Planning for an appeal often begins as early as drafting the complaint or answer, and sometimes even before that. Our clients frequently call upon us to assist their trial counsel in specific areas, including the initial formulation of a case, briefing and arguing dispositive motions, developing legal theories and trial strategy, preparing trial briefs and jury instructions, and briefing and arguing post-trial motions in anticipation of an appeal.In short, we are lawyers who specialize primarily in written advocacy. What we do not do are the things trial lawyers do best – develop evidence through discovery and present and cross-examine witnesses.As counsellorsAnother substantial portion of our practice involves consultation with clients regarding complex legal issues, including issues involving insurance coverage and duties to insureds. Institutional clients frequently ask us to conduct legal research, formulate arguments, draft opinion letters, and prepare sample briefs on important issues for use by the client's trial counsel, enabling the client to obtain a consistent, focused and effective argument without unnecessary duplication of effort. When clients appear headed towards litigation, we are sometimes asked to draft crucial correspondence that may later become evidence in the litigation. On other occasions we have been called upon to formulate arguments in connection with settlement negotiations.A particular benefit to our institutional clients is the quality and consistency they achieve by having a single firm provide appellate work and consultation on issues that surface repeatedly in their businesses.Scope of issuesWe do not limit ourselves to any particular substantive areas of the law. We have represented clients – both plaintiffs and defendants – in such diverse areas as constitutional law, civil rights, governmental torts and immunities, personal injury torts, insurance coverage and bad faith, complex business disputes, business torts, copyright, unfair competition, antitrust, RICO, securities, entertainment and environmental law, employment discrimination and wrongful termination, maritime law, family law, bankruptcy and probate.ClienteleOur diverse clients include banks, national manufacturers, major liability, casualty and title insurance companies, state and local governments, hospitals, state universities, entertainment industry companies and talent and trial lawyers.* * *We strive to provide the highest quality of legal services through painstaking research, critical analysis and interchange of ideas among our lawyers. We believe that, despite the talent of our associates, every case requires the intense and continuous involvement of a partner.

Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP & Joy Attorneys

Los Angeles California lawyer Diamond, Alan J. Los Angeles California lawyer Hackett, David E. Los Angeles California lawyer Oill, Carolyn Los Angeles California lawyer Olson, Robert A. Los Angeles California lawyer Ravitz, Barbara W. Los Angeles California lawyer Rasch, Meehan Los Angeles California lawyer Raskin, Jeffrey E. Los Angeles California lawyer Richland, Kent L. Los Angeles California lawyer Tobisman, Cynthia E. Los Angeles California lawyer Turner, Alison M. Los Angeles California lawyer Xanders, Edward L. Los Angeles California lawyer Wax, Gary J.

Federal Appellate Practice, State Appellate Practice legal template form download

lawyer Wax, Gary J. Reviews

Questions about entry-level Property/Real estate jobs.?

That's the HTML I made, how can I make it so that when the user clicks the submit button, instead of using the data they have input to make an email, it actually automatically sends the email when they click submit?. . Thanks in advance :).

The current Passport alongwith photocopy having valid Visa or Residence Permit is required to be enclosed with photocopies of detail pages and Visa. In case the latest Passport is additional booklet(s) issued to the original Passport, the additional booklet(s) plus the original Passport must be furnished..

Can you change the biological mothers name on a birth certificate?

In a recent article, 55 dogs of all ages, were removed from a horribly filthy and cruelly inhumane conditions. No arrests were made. If there are such weak laws to convict these criminals in light of overwhelming evidence, what recourse do we, concerned animal lovers, have? If you have any information on ways to encourage stiffer penalties for these sick people or to help in any way...please let us hear about them..

matched pairs - same object in a pre/post condition, this is similar to a one sample test.. . Let (X1, Y1) ... (Xn, Yn) be a sample of ordered pairs.. Let D1, D2, ... , Dn be the differencs Yi - Xi = Di. Let Dbar be the mean difference. Let sD be the standard deviation of the difference. . to test the null hypothesis . H0: ?D = ? or. H0: ?D ? ? or. H0: ?D ? ?. . find the test statistic t = (Dbar - ?) / (sD / sqrt(n)). . The p-value of the test is the area under the normal curve that is in agreement with the alternate hypothesis.. . H1: ?D ? ?

this is the lawyers reviews