LanghornePennsylvania(PA) Young, Ilene Esquire personal infomation and areas of practice

Pennsylvania LanghorneIlene Young Law Offices attorney Young, Ilene Esquire is a Very good lawyer practice area in Education Law,Education Law,Ilene Young Law Offices

if you have any problem in Education Law,Education Law,please email to Ilene Young Law Offices or call 215-750-9500 or Go to our company directly(addr:The Lofts at Oxford Valley Suite 204Langhorne,PA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

• A practicing attorney since 1983, Ilene B. Young, Esquire, combines her courtroom experience in general civil and family law with her knowledge in legal matters concerning children with special needs. As a parent of a special needs child, Ilene recognizes that the times a family member is in need of assistance and counsel are filled with uncertainty and endeavors to develop a full understanding of the legal situation through careful attention to the client's needs. In her exceptional children practice, she believes in offering parents strength through knowledge, and enabling parents to effectively advocate for their own child, navigate the complexities of the legal and educational systems, obtain the services to which the law entitles them, and achieve the peace of mind which comes from successful planning.

  Ilene is a member and course planner with the Pennsylvania Bar Association's Legal Services for Exceptional Children Committee, a professional member of the Pennsylvania Children's Behavioral Health Task Force, a member of the Elder Law Committee of the Pennsylvania Bar Association, and a member of many special needs advocacy and support organizations including Aspen and Autism Society of America. She is also a member of the Council of Parents Attorneys and Advocates, a national collegiate organization of parent's attorneys in special education dedicated to maintaining standards in the profession. She has been an invited speaker throughout the country on legal topics relating to Special Needs Children and Special Education.

  Ilene Young's practice, Young Law Offices of suburban Philadelphia, is limited to legal issues of families with special needs. After working in the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Ilene was a founding partner of Petkov, Sninski and Cardonick. . With a background in Philadelphia civil litigation and family law, she combines courtroom experience with specialized knowledge in legal maters concerning exceptional children. She has been an invited speaker on education topics in various professional and nonprofessional forums nationwide, and is a member and course planner with the Pennsylvania Bar Association's Committee. She is also a Professional member of the Pennsylvania State Children's Behavioral Health Task Force, TASH and the council of Parents Advocates and Attorneys, a national collegiate organization which promotes the exchange of information and maintenance of standards for parents' attorneys. She received her J.D. Degree with honors from Temple University, Where she was the recipient of three bests and the Barristers Award for Trial Advocacy.

• Pennsylvania, 1982 U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1982 U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania, 1982 U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania, 1982

• Pennsylvania Bar Association (Member, Exceptional Children Committee) Pennsylvania Bar Association (Course Planner, Exceptional Children Committee) Pennsylvania Children's Behavioral Health Task Force (Professional Member) Pennsylvania Bar Association (Member, Elder Law Committee) Aspen and Autism Society of America (Member) Council of Parents Attorneys and Advocates (Member)

• Temple University School of Law, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1982J.D.Honors: 3 bests, Barrister's Award for Trial Advocacy Temple University, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaM.C.L. Temple University, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaB.A.

• A practicing attorney since 1981, Ilene B. Young, Esquire, combines her courtroom experience in general civil and family law with her knowledge in legal matters concerning children, individuals, and families with special needs.? She has written and presented practice guides and seminars for fellow attorneys on representing parents in special education law, as well as the unique issues presented by individuals with special needs in domestic relations.? Her practice, Young Law Offices, is limited to the counsel and representation of individuals and families with special needs, and select private organizations serving the disabilities community.? We consider this community to be our community.

  All members of our professional staff have a background in advocacy and training in the particular issues we face.? As a parent of a child with special needs, Ilene Young, principal attorney,?recognizes that the times when a family member is seeking legal assistance may be filled with uncertainty.? The office is professionally staffed with these needs in mind, so that clients may feel comfortable speaking with any staff member.? Our current paralegal and advocate, Rita, has a deep background in both litigation support and professional parent advocacy.? Our part time adjunct advocate has been trained in the COPAA approved advocacy program.?

  In our education law practice, we have successfully represented parents in special education due process hearings and appeals for many years.? We believe in strength through knowledge, and hope to enable parents to navigate the special education systems, obtain the services to which the law entitles them, and achieve the peace of mind which comes from successful planning.? Please visit our website for links to reported decisions.? In family law, children and family?members with special needs present unique issues in suport, custody, guardianship, estate planning, and divorce settlements.? Our office directly represents clients in these matters, and also consults with other domestic relations attorneys to assist them in properly presenting the issues of special needs individuals to the courts. In veterans disability claims denial appeals, Ilene is one of the few local members of the bar of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans' Affairs, and represents Pennsylvania veterans in this specialized court.? See our web site for further information about the appeals process.

  ?

  Attorney Biography:? Ilene Young is a member and course planner with the Pennsylvania Bar Association's Legal Services for Exceptional Children Committee, a professional member of the Pennsylvania Children's Behavioral Health Task Force, a member of the Civil Rights, Federal Practice, and Family Law Sections of the Pennsylvania Bar Association, a member of the Bucks County Bar Association, and of many special needs advocacy and support organizations including Aspen, Autism Society of America and TASH.? She is also a member of the Council of Parents Attorney's and Advocates, a national collegiate organization of parents' attorneys in special education dedicated to maintaining standards in the profession.? She has been an invited speaker throughout the country on legal topics.

  Prior to establishing her present practice, Ilene was a founding partner of Petkov, Sninski and Cardonick.? She received her J.D. Degree with honors from Temple University School of Law in 1981, where she was the recipient of three bests, the Barrister's Award for Trial Advocacy, and the American Jurisprudence Award.? She is currently an elected member of the Bucks County Democratic Party Executive Committee. She had three sons.

Ilene Young Law Offices & Joy Attorneys

Langhorne Pennsylvania lawyer Young, Ilene Esquire

Education Law,Education Law legal template form download

lawyer Young, Ilene Esquire Reviews

. That the right of secession was understood is easily and readily seen. First are the words of the Framers and records from the convention itself. Then in 1798, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (while the former was the Vice-President and the latter had just left Congress) penned he Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, wherein they argued in favor of the right of the several states to nullify federal law, and, but extension, to secede. In 1803, again in 1812, yet again in 1814 and yet again in 1815, the New England states threatened to secede, clearly proving they knew they had the right. Southern statesmen, while acknowledging the right, convinced their norther cousins to stay in the confederacy. In 1820-21 states on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line threatened secession over the illegal and unconstitutional Missouri Compromises. In 1837 South Carolina threatened to secede during the Tariff Act/Nullification Act crisis and there were rumblings in other states to do so before the crisis was resolved. On January 12, 1848, a Congressman from Illinois gave an eloquent speech on the floor of Congress in support of the right of secession. His name was Abraham Lincoln (Daniel Webster, in his earlier years when secession was advantageous to him and his state, was also rather outspoken in support of the right - as happens to so many politicians, the wind blew and both Webster and Lincoln did abrupt 180's) Once again in 1856, states in the north and south alike threatened to secede when the Taney Court handed down the (constitutionally and legally correct) decision in the Dred Scott case.. . In 1860/61, it was all too clear that the South had lost all say, let alone any meaningful part, in the federal government and it was even more clear that the Northern majorities in the House and Senate were going to continue on the same destructive (to the south) course it had been following for decades and that he executive branch had became the exclusive province of the north (Lincoln was elected without carrying a single southern state and without even appearing on the ballot in several of them) and that the federal judiciary, appointed by the Chief Executive with the advice and consent of the Senate, would soon become a northern perk as well. Having no role in the federal government and facing financial and economic ruin because of federal policies foisted upon them, the southern states seceded. They did so in accordance with the principles of the Declaration and they did so in full compliance with constitutional mandates and due process of law. First, the duly and democratically elected representatives of the people passed the Ordinances of Secession and next, the people ratified those ordinances at the polls or in convention. In seceding, the CSA states opted out of the USA confederation of nations and created their own confederacy. They simply reclaimed the autonomy, sovereignty and independence they had never surrendered.. . The remaining nations in the USA responded immediately and unequivocally. They launched a war of aggression and invaded the sovereign nations of the CSA with the sole goals of conquering and annexing them. When the smoke cleared and the blood had seeped into the mud, the free and independent democratic governments of the people, by the people, for the people of the CSA had vanished from the earth. To insure that they could not and would not soon rise again, ratification of Amendment XIII was coerced from them. Abolition was hardly a humanitarian of human rights/civil rights measure, it was a tool of war - a weapon of mass destruction. So to were the illegal and unconstitutional Confiscation Acts and the later, redundant and equally illegal and unconstitutional Emancipation Proclamation.. . When the dust cleared, the USA had become a single nation, composed of subservient political subdivisions called "states". The member states were no longer independent but allied and confederated nation-states. The all-powerful NATIONAL government the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution had tried so hard to avoid and prevent had come into being and the principles and sentiments so eloquently expressed in the Declaration of Independence had proven themselves to be just so many empty words.. . Now, if you chose to use this for your homework, keep two things in mind. First, it is a perfectly sound and accurate historical analysis, based on the record of primary evidence and constitutional law as it existed in 1860. Second, it is so far afield of the myths, legends and memetic algorithms that pass themselves off as "history" that you better be prepared to support it. There support is there, volumes of it, but it will be work to find it and pull it all together. I will almost guarantee to you that your teacher has never had the ambition to put in that effort. Very few of them have.

just google 'free samples'. . not all companies do them, there are specilised sites that list every new free sample that comes out, and it's well worth signing up to one of the sites that are in your city/country, they will list all the new free samples and you can just apply.

Its been almost two years of applying to jobs like cashier, customer service to places like Target, Starbucks, Walmart, etc. about twice and I've gotten an interview only once. Yes, once. I am so frustrated because I just can't get a job and I don't know exactly why. I must admit that I have no experience in absolutely anything, but I do have some skills that could be very well applicable to the job position yet no one seems to care abut them. Does not having experience really hurts your job application to the point where companies won't even think of you as a candidate for their position? I mean I may not have experience but I've been in college for three years. That has to help, right? . What do you guys think? Any suggestions on how to get a job are much welcome.. By the way I'm 21 and when I say twice I mean twice on every store, not twice in my life..

I seem to recall an article sometime ago about Star Trek. The article stated that the winning design of the starship was submitted to Lucille Ball for an exciting "new" science fiction series by a NASA engineer in the spring of 1966. I was wondering if there is any truth to this story..

What's a good way to set up an estate for someone planning a suicide? Who would you allocate your assets to? Would you set up charitable contributions or a scholarship fund?.

Also I would recommend calling instead or going down to that place. See if there were 10 people applying for this apprenticeship and you're the only one who went and spoke to them in person. That would put you above the rest.

this is the lawyers reviews